u can remove the modulus signs here since by property both of them r always > 0 to be defined...
so it comes out:: logxx-1 >0..
Now x is not equal to 0 and 1.
now x-1 >x0(=1)
so x>2
u can remove the modulus signs here since by property both of them r always > 0 to be defined...
so it comes out:: logxx-1 >0..
Now x is not equal to 0 and 1.
now x-1 >x0(=1)
so x>2
what bout x = 0,1,-1 ???????????
secondly... how can u directly remove mod...!!
please post a logical soln..!!
its logical as far as i think. ... Hav u read the properties of logarithm? If i m conceptually wrong, pleas correct me....
srry.. fr the first line... 0,-1,1.. u already hv this excluded in ur soln..
but what about.. x = 1/2?
I'm doing one part. Please tell where i'm wrong.
Let 0 < x < 1 (since both values can't be attained)
then logx 1-x ≥ 0 which implies 1-x ≤ x0 = 1 implies x ≥ 0. but 0 < x < 1 , hence it is one solution.
Now, Let x >1
then we get x ≥2 , the other range. and then similarly for x <0
sorry @Rahul for my comment.. I have posted an incomplete solution above...
not an issue...
actually this is how the soln. goes like...!!
log |x| |x - 1| > 0
clearly, |x| as in base > 0 and not equal to 1
so here goes the cases,
case 1) |x| > 1 so, |x - 1| > 1 (= sign is used as for 2 its possible)
now, taking the intersection we get, x E (-∞ , -1) U [2, ∞) ----------- (i)
case 2) 0 < |x| < 1 (not equal to 1 u knw why?...) so |x - 1| < 1 (don't think of x being -1)
so, taking the intersection again we get, x E (0,1)
thus, final soln. is...
x E (-∞ , -1) U (0,1) U [2, ∞) ... as far as i think..bt in AOPS ,2 is excluded but on checking it is perect