matrices

let
l l
l 1 0 0 l
l l
A= l 3 w 0 l
l l
l 0 3-i w^2 l
l l

then

a) A^105 is a lower triangular matrix
b) A^106 is a upper triangular matrix
c) trace of A^109 is zero
d) trace of A^108 is w^108

w, w^2 are cube oots of unity
A is a 3X3 matrix

18 Answers

1
rickde ·

well no breakthroughs?????

4
UTTARA ·

@eragon : sry my mistake

Thanks n ya I agree with the given ans

1
rickde ·

gr8 one eragon

21
eragon24 _Retired ·

for lower triangular matrix aij=0 for for j>i

so @uttra clearly A^106 is a lower triangular matrix..how u r saying it as upper triagular?

and again identity matrix is both upper and lower triangular.

4
UTTARA ·

may be u r right but I 've seen the definition of upper and lower triangular in TMH

it says only aij i < j is lower triangular

21
eragon24 _Retired ·

@uttara-well i wud say check the definition of lower and upper triangular matrix.

and an identity matrix is both upper triangular and lower triagular matrix.

"A matrix which is simultaneously upper and lower triangular is diagonal. The identity matrix is the only matrix which is both upper and lower unitriangular"-- this is what wiki says.

So given answers r correct

4
UTTARA ·

@ eraGON & utd4ever
I don't know where i made a mistake but somehow my ans doesn't match with urs

A3 = I

sO A105 = A108 = I

Identity matrix ≠lower triangular matrix

So A & D R wrong

A109 = A108 A = I A = A

Trace (A109 ) = 1 + W + W2 = 0

A106 = A105 A = I A = A --->upper triangular matrix

So ans shud be B & C

1
utd4ever ·

ans is A and C ...
we get
A105=I
A106=A
A108=I
A109=A

21
eragon24 _Retired ·

use Cayley–Hamilton theorem

such that u getA^3=\begin{vmatrix} 1 & 0&0 \\ 0 & 1&0 \\ 0&0&1 \end{vmatrix}

Now A^{105}=\begin{vmatrix} 1 & 0&0 \\ 0 & 1&0 \\ 0&0&1 \end{vmatrix}

A^{106}=\begin{vmatrix} 1 & 0&0 \\ 3 & \omega &0 \\ 0&3-i&\omega^2 \end{vmatrix}

calculate A108 AND A109 accordingly

note-
1)identity matrix remains same no matter to wat power u raise it.

2)an identity matrix is both upper traigular and lower triagular matrix.

3)if u dunno know abt cayley hamilton theorem check this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley%E2%80%93Hamilton_theorem

*thats not a determinant btw...by mistake i used determinamt brackets instead of matrix one

1
rickde ·

ans A,C

sry for matrix unable to make a gud one [3]

39
Pritish Chakraborty ·

Oh..blunder. Missed the 0.

1
rickde ·

The determinant of a triangular matrix equals the product of the diagonal entries

1
rickde ·

surely u must have made a calculation mistake
this is a triangular matrix lAl=1*w*w^2=1

39
Pritish Chakraborty ·

|A| = w^3 - 3 + i = i - 2 ≠1??

1
rickde ·

do u kno how to solve such ones

one thing common tat all have lAl=1....wonder will it help...[7]

39
Pritish Chakraborty ·

Oh I didn't notice that one!

1
rickde ·

but it is A^109 not A

see A*A trace does not come out to be zero

39
Pritish Chakraborty ·

c) toh pakka as 1 + w + w^2 = 0(relation in complex numbers).

1 + \omega + \omega^2 = 1 + \frac{-1+\sqrt{3}i}{2} + \frac{-1-\sqrt{3}i}{2} = 1 - 1 = 0

(Trace is the sum of the elements on the main diagonal, we don't include secondary diagonal here)

Your Answer

Close [X]