Q 1 ) is the root x = -1 ?
Q1 : If p(x) is a reciprocal polynomial of odd degree , then one of the roots of p(x)= 0 , is ??
Q2: Sum of rational roots of
x5 = (133x - 78) / (133 - 78 x )
-
UP 0 DOWN 0 1 11
11 Answers
suppose p(x) is a polynomial function of degree n .
then p(x) is a reciprocal function if ... coefficient of xn-r= ceff of x r
consider a general reciprocal function of degree n .
p(x) = a_{0}+a_{1}x + a_{2}x^{2}......+a_{2}x^{n-2}+a_{1}x^{n-1} + a_{0}x^{n}
so, p(\frac{1}{x}) = a_{0}+a_{1}/x + a_{2}/x^{2}......+a_{2}/x^{n-2}+a_{1}/x^{n-1} + a_{0}/x^{n}
so, p(\frac{1}{x}) =\frac{1}{x^{n}} (a_{0}+a_{1}x + a_{2}x^{2}......+a_{2}x^{n-2}+a_{1}x^{n-1} + a_{0}x^{n})
so, p(\frac{1}{x}) =\frac{1}{x^{n}} (p(x))
p(x)=x^{n}p(\frac{1}{x})
putting\; x=-1,
p(-1)=-p(-1)
p(-1)+p(-1)=0
\Rightarrow p(-1)=0
so x = -1 is a root
Edit: fogot to mention that here n = odd
Q1:
After putting x = -1, we get:
P (-1) = (-1)n P( -1)
Then we get (-1)n = 1, which is not possible for an odd value of n.
However, if you try with 1, we get
P (1) = 1n P(1)
For any defined real value of n, we find this equality exists.
Hence, 1 is a root of the polynomial.
Qsn 2.
Just cross multiply and expand.
You get the equation as :
-78 x6 + 133 x5 - 133 x + 78 = 0.
Putting x = 1 and x = -1 satisfies this polynomial.
Divide the polynomial by (x-1)(x+1)
We get :
(x+1)(x-1)( -78 x4 + 133 x3 -78 x2 + 133 x -1) = 0
The remnant polynomial cannot be factorised in my opinion, so the only real roots i have obtained are 1 and -1.
Sum of roots = 0.
in # 3 , i fogot to write dat n = odd.
ankur , let us consider a polynomial p (x) .
now x1 will be a root of the polynomial p(x) iff and only iff, p(x1 ) = 0
p ( x1 ) = p (x1 ) doesnt imply that x1 is the root .
actually there are infinite values of x for wich p(x) = p(x) , so are all these infinte values the roots of p (x)????
Q1: the product of roots is -1. Also if k is a root 1/k also is, thus forming pairs multiplying to 1. Since 1 cannot be a root, the unpaired root is forced to be -1
Hmm...Qwerty, i got ur point... had tht discussion wid shakexpear y'day nite...
Jus got a bit cnfused since u hdnt mentioned tht n = odd.
THNX :) prophet sir !
and thnx qwerty and ankur :)