Excellent question

thanks a lot everybody

20 Answers

1
Akand ·

exactly prajith..........ive already posted tht doubt.....

62
Lokesh Verma ·

yup it will be.. and i have changed that already.. tx for pointing out :)

1
Akand ·

ok................thnx................so wont d answer be........./4???

62
Lokesh Verma ·

yup akand.. i have fixed that part.!

62
Lokesh Verma ·

no you have to take

0∫1([x]-[x-1/2])dx=

0∫1/2([x]-[x-1/2])dx+1/2∫1([x]-[x-1/2])dx

= 0∫1/2(1)dx+1/2∫1(1/2)dx

= 1/2+0 =1/2

1
Akand ·

wel even if u r correct so wont d final answer be [x]([x]-1)/4???

1
Akand ·

how????????? example.....
x=2.3
[x]=2
[x-1/2]=1
so integral [x]-[x-1/2]=2-1=1
0∫11dx=1...........rite??

1
Akand ·

wel we cant say prajith..........coz d limits are variables of x.....so anything can happen........but i think we may be rite.....

62
Lokesh Verma ·

yes exactly akand.. so the integral from [k] to [k+1] will have it as 1/2

right?

hence there are [x] such integrals .. so it will become [x]/2!

1
MATRIX ·

ya akand!!!.......i think we r rite!!!!!!!

3
msp ·

x-1-(x-1-1/2)≤[x]-[x-1/2]≤x-x+1/2

1/2≤[x]-[x-1/2]≤1/2

1
Akand ·

it is either 1 or 0..................
1 if fractional part of x is lesser than 1/2 and 0 if its greater than 1/2

1
MATRIX ·

Bhaiyya the in question itz [x- 1/2] and not [(x-1)/2]......so it should be [x] im i rite bhaiyya!!!!!!!!!!

62
Lokesh Verma ·

think of this...

integral from 0 to 1 of [x]-[x-1/2]

1
Akand ·

wont tht be just [x]????

1
Akand ·

i dint understand hw d first part is [x]/2............

1
MATRIX ·

Thanks bhaiyya!!!!!!!

62
Lokesh Verma ·

the proof comes like this..

[x] is 1 more than [x-1/2] when x has fractional part less than 1/2

otherwise it is zero

thus the first part will be [x]/2

now we have to integrate this from 0 to [x]

which will be 1/2+2/2+3/2.....+([x]-1)/2

= [x].([x]-1)/4
= [x].([x]-1)/2

1
Akand ·

wats d procedure???? bhaiyya.....

1
Telakadan ·

i didnt get u sankara

Your Answer

Close [X]