but in book it is given to prove that eq in new position ≡
lx + my ±√l2+m2 tan θ [2] is this wrong then
if a plane lx + my = 0 ________ 1
is rotated about its line of intersection with plane z=0 (which should be same as 1 i think)
so the new plane should have a "z" in its equation ??
am i right over here? if no please explain
as illustration you may write down new plane eq. in case rotation is done by "θ"
but in book it is given to prove that eq in new position ≡
lx + my ±√l2+m2 tan θ [2] is this wrong then