1
Philip Calvert
·2009-02-07 05:22:07
well i still don't see how the answer is what it is
can u explain or maybe abhishek could explain
1
Philip Calvert
·2009-02-07 05:44:55
[1][3][4]
¬¬¬¬ I think abhi's are difft from mine
â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â– â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–â–
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬☺☺☺☺☻☻☻☻♥♥♥♥♥♣♣♣♣♣◙◙◙◙◙
11
Anirudh Narayanan
·2009-02-07 05:41:45
How did u guys get the designs? [7]
1
Philip Calvert
·2009-02-07 05:35:26
╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤
yes abhi i got it u are rite
╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2009-02-07 05:34:27
charges unlike means...[7]
if its non conducting charge distribution can be anything...
11
Anirudh Narayanan
·2009-02-07 05:34:16
Just like a dipole [4]
It is not necessary that the charge distribution is uniform. U can also have two discrete charge placed on diametrically opposite points [1]
1
Philip Calvert
·2009-02-07 05:32:52
╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬
hmmm... it never occurred to me that charges can be unlike also
....
ok
╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2009-02-07 05:29:56
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
i think its about what i said earlier it depends on distribution of charge...
it depends on λ as a function of θ... there can be such a function that enables this... that function jsut not striking right now...
but clearly signs can be thought of ..
_____________________
wait...
it can be q=-q0 for θ=900 and q=+q0 for θ=2700 and for rest θ q=0.. this can have field in direction 1
similarly for situation 2...
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
11
Subash
·2009-02-07 05:23:57
ani it was actually part of a matrix match question
@philip i cant explain cos i dunno thats why i asked this
11
Anirudh Narayanan
·2009-02-07 05:23:28
Philip, we can arrange charges so that the field at a point points in a direction we want it to [4]
11
Anirudh Narayanan
·2009-02-07 05:22:30
Ans can be: in any direction and not only 1, 2, 3 and 4 [4]
We are given these 4 options bcos only 4 options are allowed in an MCQ [4]
11
Subash
·2009-02-06 23:22:15
considering the circle as a charged ring the direction of the net electric field direction can be????
11
Subash
·2009-02-07 05:19:18
its not mentioned whether its conducting or not just that it is "charged" is given
11
Subash
·2009-02-07 05:16:39
guyz this is not a sitter i thought like that too
answer was 1,2,3,4
1
rahul wadhwani
·2009-02-07 00:05:51
ya component is possible whole vector along 1/2 is impossible at any cost
1
Philip Calvert
·2009-02-07 00:05:51
that is what i think i meant so the answer can never be 1 or 2
1
rahul wadhwani
·2009-02-07 00:04:00
it is impossible to have 1/2 but we can get near 1/2 means some inclined small angle is there
1
Philip Calvert
·2009-02-07 00:02:12
abhi can you give a case when the direction of electric field is 1 or 2
even in the case of non uniform distribution of charge
i asked bcoz i could not see one
1
rahul wadhwani
·2009-02-07 00:01:00
tats also right but if u take uniform then .....but in this we have to preassumed, as all option r related to uniform distrbution i think subash has forgotten to write "conducting"
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2009-02-06 23:59:18
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
depends on ring is uniformly charged or not..
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
1
rahul wadhwani
·2009-02-06 23:56:39
ans. is 3 & 4 both possible for pt. with suitable signs but if u placed large(size) then this may differ from 3&4 but surely neither 1&2
1
chakde
·2009-02-06 23:33:04
THIS ONE'S A SITTER.........
ANS 3....