Daily Graph 10-04-09

y= {x}{x}

18 Answers

11
virang1 Jhaveri ·

Sorry i totally forgot that in {x} there is no negative part

{x}{x} ≤1 if x>0

For 0<x<1
y = xx

if y(xx)>x

log y =x log x
dy/ydx= 1 + logx
0 = y + y logx

0 =1 + logx
log x = -1

x = 1/2.72
x = 0.367 it it the minimum
y = 0.69 minimum

62
Lokesh Verma ·

great work asish :)

106
Asish Mahapatra ·

y=xx in the interval [0,1)
y>0

let y=lim(x->0){x}{x}
lny = lim(x->0){x}ln{x}
lny = lim(x->0+)lnx/(1/x) using LH rule
lny = lim(x->0+)(1/x)/(-1/x2)
lny = 0
y = 1

f(0+) = 1
f(1-) = 1

f'(x) = xx + xxlnx = xx(1+lnx)
f''(x) = xx(1+lnx) + (1+lnx)2xx + xx-1
= xx-1[(1+lnx)(2+lnx) + 1]
= xx-1[3+3lnx+(lnx)2] > 0

f'(x) >0 when 1+lnx>0 i.e. lnx > -1 i.e 1>x > 1/e
f'(x) <0 when x<1/e

11
Mani Pal Singh ·

Try dis 1

11
Subash ·

the limit would be 1?

because in 0-1

{x}=x

so it is equivalent to Ltx→0xx

1
kartik sai ·

62
Lokesh Verma ·

You have to find limit x->0 of f(x)

62
Lokesh Verma ·

You are right mani in saying that the values wont exist at the integers...

but the other analysis on your graph I am not very convinced!

11
Mani Pal Singh ·

sir

AM I WRONG IN SAYING THAT WE WON'T HAVE A VALUE OF THE FUNCTION AT THE INTEGERS
OR
THE VALUE EXISTS?????????/

62
Lokesh Verma ·

This I thought was very easy! :O

Ppl did the other one.. but not this one :O

62
Lokesh Verma ·

why are there two values of y!!!??

11
virang1 Jhaveri ·

I forgot the minus sign therefore reposted the graph

11
virang1 Jhaveri ·

Bhaiyya pls check if its rite or wrong?

11
virang1 Jhaveri ·

{x}{x} ≤1 if x>0

For 0<x<1
y = xx

if y(xx)>x

log y =x log x
dy/ydx= 1 + logx
0 = y + y logx

0 =1 + logx
log x = -1

x = 1/2.72
x = 0.367 it it the minimum
y = 0.69 minimum

1
Philip Calvert ·

for very small x y will be large i mean closer to one

11
Mani Pal Singh ·

sorry 4 the previous graph[2]

1
Philip Calvert ·

y should not be greater than or = 1 perhaps

62
Lokesh Verma ·

are these tending to infinity?

Your Answer

Close [X]