Double collision of spring mass system

A ball of mass M moving with velocity V0 on a frictionless surface strikes the first of two identical balls, each of mass m = 2 kg, connected by a massless spring with spring constant k = 1 kg/s2 (see Figure). Consider the collision to be central and elastic and essentially instantaneous.

(a) Find the minimum value of the mass M for the incident ball to strike the system of two balls again.
(b) How much time will elapse between the two collisions?

21 Answers

1
Ricky ·

The velocity of COM = V22 = V4 ........( let )

Now , the kinetic energy of the balls must be converted totally into the potential energy of the spring after everything has stopped : )

So , 12 K A 2 = 12 m V42

Or , A = V0 Mω ( M + m )

Now , the motion of the ball 2 can be completely described as : -

x2 ( t ) = x2 ( t ) [ In COM frame ] + xCOM ( t )

= V0 Mω ( M + m ) sin ( ω t ) + V0 M tM + m

= V0 M tM + m [ 1 + sin ( ω t )ω t ]

whereas , ........ x1 ( t ) = V0 t ( M - mM + m )

For collision to occur between balls 1 and 2 , we obviously need to have

x1 = x2

1
Ricky ·

Sir ,

Mm = - sin xx = ξ ...............( 1 )

How is -

M = mξ Min. ?

Later , I found out the mistake -

mM = - sin xx ...................instead of ( 1 )

Thanks Sir .

66
kaymant ·

Once you get the equation
sin x x= - ξ
and you are looking for the min of ξ so that a solution may exist, just look for the absolute minimum of the function sin xx. This is easier said than done.
One way is to differentiate w.r.t. x and equate the derivative to zero. This gives the transcendental equation
tan x = -x.
There is no algebraic solution, but graphical means give x ≈ 2.02875 (which is very roughly 2/3π).
From here we get M = m/ξmin ≈ 10 kg. (This again you taken wrongly, ricky. You found M = m ξmin which won't be 10kg)

1
Ricky ·

" But your assertion that the min is 2/3Ï€ is not correct. "

What is the reason behind this , Sir ? : )

66
kaymant ·

Well yes, I overlooked the interval you specified (and the last statement was a blind guess).
But your assertion that the min is 2/3Ï€ is not correct. If you see the answer I gave was only approximate.

1
Ricky ·

No Sir , Not at all . In fact , please google " Jordan's Inequality " sir , I think that's enough .

66
kaymant ·

@Ricky, check your inequality again. How do you get
sin xx ≥ 2π
That's true for the integral of sin x/x

1
seoni ·

fantastic work ricky......

& an excellent ques from anant sir,,,

1
Ricky ·

EDIT - POST NUMBER 10 : LINE NUMBER 5 SHOULD BE READ AS : -

M V02 = M V12 + m V22

1
Ricky ·

Since the equality holds true in the second inequality if and only if -

x = 3 π2 , i . e ,

ω t = 3 π2

Hence the required time elapsed between the collisions = 3 Ï€2 m K = 3 Ï€ √ m 8 k ≈ 5 seconds ........if my calculator is right : )

1
Ricky ·

Cancelling appropriate terms , we obtain -

Mm = - sin ( ω t )ω t = ξ ......... ( let )

Now we need to minimise " ξ " .

Jordan ' s inequality states that , for any " x E ( 0 , π2 ) " ;

sin xx ≥ 2π

Just changing the interval suitably , we can derive the following : - For any " x E ( π , 3 π2 ) " ;

- sin xx ≥ 23 π

Hence , ξ Min. = 23 π

Consequently , M = m ξ Min. = 2 m3 π ≈ 10 Kg

66
kaymant ·

approach is okay... however the graphs are not the ones you are looking for......
and
M\approx \dfrac{2}{3\pi}m

1
Ricky ·

Here , ω = K m , where " K = New spring constant " .

Immediately , one would ask , " why is there a new spring constant " ? It is because the effective length of the spring has been halved in COM frame . Accordingly , since the spring constant is inversely proportional to the length of the spring , hence ,

K = 2 k

Now the quest is to find the amplitude .

1
Ricky ·

Let V1 and V2 be the velocities of the respective balls ( 1 and 2 ) after the first collision .

Of course , after the first collision , the speeds of balls 2 and 3 must be equal .

Momentum and energy conservation gives us -

M V0 = m V2 + M V1

M V02 = m V22 + M V02 )

Easily solving for the assumed velocities , we find -

V1 = V0 ( M - mM + m )

V2 = V0 ( 2 MM + m )

If we now fix the reference frame to the center of mass of the two connected balls , it is easy to realize that the masses are just contracting and expanding in that frame , i . e , they are performing S . H . M .

Now , it has to be noted that the equation of the S . H . M . has to be a " sine " curve , since , at " t = 0 " , there was no S . H . M .

Let the equation of the motion with respect to COM be - x ( t ) = A sin ( ω t )

1
Philip Calvert ·

Hopefully not......
This one came in some olympiad maybe.....
it says (Moscow Phys-Tech) and I don't know what that means.
but its a basic one for all that....

I had thought of posting this one long time ago but seeing the interest in some other mechanics problems I posted, I thought its useless :P

66
kaymant ·

Is this going to end in the archives?

1
Ricky ·

Thanks yaar , but now how to proceed ?

1
Ricky ·

I am really very sorry if I hurt your emotions , very sorry . But in fact , I just wanted to know how to bring in that " sin x " , that ' s all . I know that it ' ll execute SHM with a reduced mass frequency , but where does " sin x " come in ? Please , this is my doubt .

I am weak in Physics [2][2] , so again sorry if I hurt you .

1
Ricky ·

@aitday , can you please tell me where does " sin x " come in at all ? All I got was ,

V0 2 { M - m m } = K x 2m + 2 V 1 ( V 1 - V 0 )

where V 1 is the velocity of the first block .

Kaymant sir , can you please give a hint ? What is the condition we have to use here ?

1
terror s ·

aitday,will u never post the answer for the question asked??

1
terror s ·

can u post the solution sir?

Your Answer

Close [X]