1eureka review the examples u gave for urself.............
u will realize that those examples point out that the given statement is wrong.............try to scrutinize ur examples u will get wat i wanna tell u[1]
i read above statement in some study source..............is it correct..........if yes,then xplain..............if no,then explain
[3]i mean in both cases xplanation is wat i want[3]
thanq!
-
UP 0 DOWN 0 1 12
12 Answers
1kaymant sir,
plz help here.............i have a doubt here!!!!!!!!!!plz reply!!!!!!!!
1hey any of sirs,gals,guys plz touch this one..............this question is [3]""""""ASIN"""""""""[3]...............i.e. this ques. din do any sin........why neglect it then???????
1I dont think so !
Coz it doesn't follow all the principles of rigid body motion !!
24soory for late reply cena....
i ma not sure about it....the answer maybe yes and no tooo
when liquid is rotated in a vessel it forms a parabolic shape and retains it ..so we can say htat this is rigid body motion....
when liquid is accelrated horz...then it attains a wedge shape..so again it is like rigid body....
i am looking for other examples ..give me some time...
I may be worng tooo in whatecver i said above
1
1i think this statement is rite...n wat i can gather is this....
c......
a liquid in a vessel is not deformed ie. it doesnt get compressed or expanded as a solid body
its volume is constant n dats wat a rigid body is....u r mistakin it wid change in shape at constant volume
1sidsgr88
don't take me otherwise.........plz
don u think that wat definition u think of a rigid body needs some amendment!!!!![1]
9u shud be confident of urself kid
i know that u know that the statement is false in general.
maybe true in certain context of view
eg F = ma appliies to liquid in a vessel
1but if it cumes in assertion and reason.....thn will it be a true ?????
1the statement wants to say tat we can apply F=Ma to the vessel irrespective of wat is happening to the liquid