metre bridge...

a metre bridge is used to determine d resistance of an unknown wire by measuring d balance point L.if d wire is replaced by another wire of same material with double d length n half d thickness d balancin point is expected to be...........................................

pls help me....

28 Answers

1
Pavithra Ramamoorthy ·

@byah.. frm viteee 2008............

1
Pavithra Ramamoorthy ·

proper solution:

R/R'=l/l'

=(\rho l/\pi r^2)/(\rho (2l)/\pi (r/2)^2)

=1/8=l/l'

therfore l'=8l.............

hence solved.....;-))))

62
Lokesh Verma ·

ramkumar.. i think what you are doing is to extend the meter wire..

but i think the question has some flaws and i dont seehow it can be solved.

1
Pavithra Ramamoorthy ·

byah.... wats d conclusion??????????

1
Kalyan Pilla ·

The question falters somewhere......

No conditions giv an answer from the options[92][79]

1
Pavithra Ramamoorthy ·

since material being same d resistivity also remains constant....

R is PROPORTIONAL TO l ....

so it shld change similarly.................

62
Lokesh Verma ·

ramkumar..

resistance becomein 8R does not mean that balancing length changes similarly.. can you prove this claim?

1
Pavithra Ramamoorthy ·

R/R'=l/l'

R=\rhol/A

R==\rhol/pi r2
l'=2l
r'=r/2

on substitutin d values we get

R'=8R

THEREFORE THE NEW BALANCIN LENGTH IS EXPECTED TO BE 8l

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

Even i didn't understand my answer bhaiya......i thot i had understood the question but it seems i didn't afterall!!!

62
Lokesh Verma ·

I am not convinced with that answer Ani..

I guess either I am not able to understand the question or the question is not able to udnerstand me :D

I am very close to assuming that there was a mistake inteh VITEEE2008 paper!

1
Pavithra Ramamoorthy ·

dats k... then????????

24
eureka123 ·

For wire::
Rinitital=ρl/π(d/2)2
R final=2ρl/π(d/4)2

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

half, the thickness means....1/2 d.ohhhhhhhh

SORRY MACHAN

So answer is L/8??

1
Pavithra Ramamoorthy ·

@ani.. wat u ve substituted fr AREA??????????

1
Kalyan Pilla ·

The balance point would be obtained at 2L as the thickness of wire is uniform, (whatever be the width it is uniform). As the resistance remains same, and length of wire( say d) doubles.

L/(d-L) = l/(2d-l)
→l=2L

Is that right??

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

wat calc. mistake??

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

Ya i noticed.....but,Bhaiya i think he meant (\frac{1}{4})L

1
Pavithra Ramamoorthy ·

but ani u made a mistake in calculatin d new resistance.........

62
Lokesh Verma ·

Ani... A and B seem incorrect dimensionally!

62
Lokesh Verma ·

ramkumar where did you get this question from?

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

ya da...i gave (b)

1
Pavithra Ramamoorthy ·

pls see d options given ,ani..........

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

I am also weak in this part,,,,, so don't trust my answer

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

Let original resistance per unit length be δ

Since thickness (diameter) is halved, area will be 1/4 original area....

SO the new resistance will be =ρ(2l)/4A =R/2

Hence new resistance per unit length will be \frac{R}{2(2l)}=R/4l= δ/4

Thus for the same R, new balancing length must be L/4

1
Pavithra Ramamoorthy ·

practically thinkin ll d balancin length ll be lesser or greater fr d above conditions???????????????????????

62
Lokesh Verma ·

you have to make a balanced wheatstone

so the ratio of the resistances should be equal....

L/(1-L)= r/R

new r'=8r (double length and half thickness)
r'/R=8r/R = x/(1-x)

so 8L/(1-L)=x/(1-x)

8L-8Lx=x-Lx
8L=1x+7Lx
x=8L/(1+7L)

I dont know how the above answer came!

Correction after Ani's post!)

1
Kalyan Pilla ·

Still thinking......................

1
Pavithra Ramamoorthy ·

NO....i m bit confused .... weak in solvin experimental prob...

i ll give u d option..

a)1/8L
b)1/4L
c)8L
d)16L

Your Answer

Close [X]