1
Rekha Singhwal
·2008-10-17 07:42:21
As far as I think, the solution will be something like this.
First let consider for any horizontal velocity Vx
The vertical componenet Vy will be minimum when it reduces to 0 at the top most point of tower of height 2H
So the maximum height reached is equal to 2H for this projectile motion.
the second relation can be drawn by the fact that in the time ... Vx covers √3 H ... Vy covers 2H-H = H
I think this will solve the problem.
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-10-17 09:22:38
if u r throwing to a pole h m high d distance away does min velocity is when vy=0 at pole top?
1
skygirl
·2008-10-17 19:02:17
the constraint here should be that the ball surpasses the smaller tower n not that max height is 2H....
1
skygirl
·2008-10-17 22:31:35
wont the ans depend upon the dist of the point from the foot of the small tower, from whr the ball is thrown...
the ans i got is dependent on it...
1
skygirl
·2008-10-17 22:39:46
its like.....
if the point of projection is x dist away from small tower..
one point on parabola is (x,H) and the other one is (x+√3H,2H)...
then we apply trajectory equation to both..
we get a quad equation in tanθ(θ=angle of projection)...
in this eqn we just find D>=0 for real u(initial vel.)..
for min u, D=0.
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-10-18 02:09:51
No distance frm the tower and θ would be fixed for min velocity......
Try it i will post the soln tommrow
1
skygirl
·2008-10-18 19:07:24
arrey wat a weird ans!!!!
i am getting u=√2gH !!!!!
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-10-19 07:00:49
first consider throw frm small tower to long one.
Rmax = u2/g(1+sinθ) and this u is min for a given R so
2H = umin/g(1+sinθ) now umin is found now apply energy conservation at top os small tower and ground......