How was the ppr??

hey, how was the ppr, how much u guyz expecting??

135 Answers

1
gaurav ·

maths was tough..........

1
lalit ·

what could be the cutt of this time

1
The Enlightened One - jsg ·

yes..maths was tough..paper 2 was much harder than 1..

1
gordo ·

looking at the ppr..and i can tell u, math wasn't a piece of cake by any means this time..
still, must say, proud of iit madras :D, for setting a ppr unlike that of last time, when any tom dick and harry trotted into iit

1
rickde ·

gordo bhai.........how much do u think it will take to get into 500......

sab teachers bole ppr easy ayega..................but ppr was tuff....[2]

pls tell..............feeling bad.................

1
voldy ·

where is the paper ? any links ?

1
decoder ·

prerna classes have released solutions to first paper

www.prernaclasses.com

1
gordo ·

see, looking at the 1st ppr, (which is the only ppr i have seen), i can tell u, that definitely, the cut off should be lesser than last time. i know its too early to predict stuff. but i feel something close to 260-270 should get u in the top 500 this time around, this is a purely intuitive statement.

1
rickde ·

the paper was of 489..................is 260 enuf????????

1
ABHI ·

has the solutions been posted yet in ne site??

23
qwerty ·

i was banging my head b4 paper 1 , during the brk , and even doin the same after paper 2

vaaat lag gaya

1
sidsgr88 Bora ·

i dont noe i saw the paper(dint give it thou) and it was quite easy...rather very easy ....i must say the level of jee has dropped...

1
ABHI ·

http://www.careerpointgroup.com/download/answerkey_iit_paper1_2010.asp

got d site for answer keys

1
gordo ·

@abhirup, luk at the prerna site,
@querty, sabki watt lageli hai..
@sid, u definitely must have not seen last yrs paper..
rickd, id say 270, (remember, this is intuitive, my guess, don't count on it and be happy/sad)

1
sidsgr88 Bora ·

@gordo
IIT guwahati last time had made a better paper than IIT madras made this time

1
gordo ·

@sid, that depends on how u define 'good'. If picking up match the following questions from AIEEE 2007 ppr, chem quesions from NCERT and putting 2 sulky passages in the physics ppr from modern physics is good, then yea, u can go ahead and call it good :) , but if u are looking at a ppr that can clearly screen the undeserving out of the race with nice questions, then this yrs ppr was much better.
cheers!!

1
Unicorn--- Extinct!! ·

I agree with gordo...paper was definitly good..

1
gordo ·

@sid, this is not the time for an argument. Its not necessary for some to actually give an exam to judge the questions, u can also have a look at it later. Whats gonna happen is whats gonna happen. btw to answer ur question: yes i did give IITJEE 2k9

1
decoder ·

hey how the partial marks will be awarded (in first paper multiple correct)

1
archana anand ·

http://www.ankur-gupta.com/blog/

1
gordo ·

post ur individual totals of ppr 1
M, P, C

1
voldy ·

I've not seen paper 2 , but paper chem was easy .. well it is a nice paper.. some were lame , like bond energy wala of C-C bond :P .. taking into time constraints and the tension ... it was a nice paper ..

1
RAY ·

yaar...answers alag alag hai...

acha any one temme that thermoD [probelm...jisme der is a problem ki whether its passing through the 0,0 or not...

1
voldy ·

dude mind posting the question here?

1
rickde ·

paper 2 solutions anywhere??????????

1
voldy ·

there is no partial marking dude !!!
assuming the trend has continued

1
decoder ·

dude read the instructions

it says" partial marks will be awarded for partially correct answers"

1
RAY ·

YEH!!! IT SUCKED>...COME ON!! I DINT EXPECT SUCH QUESTIONS IN IIT JEE!! :(: )

1
gordo ·

:) best way to express ur anger is by getting into it. anyways, relax dude.

1
student ·

i think it is like +1 for every right
0 if u bublle all

Your Answer

Close [X]