paper 1 i got only 74:(
pata nahin paper 2 kaisa hoga.
Paper 2 to paper 1 se bhi gaya gujra tha [2]
135 Answers
ok gordo i am deleting my comments
but it was really not a conceptual paper as u told
it was lengthy
esp paper 1
btw 1 thing wa for sure those who hav analysed JEE 2009 paper and gav jee 2010 , wud be feeling a bit angry abt IIT M , on the oder hand those who hav gr8 speed and hav good amt of practice will score more in JEE 2010
if partial marking exists , then I don't see the point of multiple-answer questions
A very handy tip.(proly not that handy to u guyz now as much as to the 11th graders), never, i repeat never expect a ppr to be like the last tym's ppr. never works in JEE. infact turns out to be quite the opposite :P
yes sri
it was really weird
first i thought i willo bublle all ABCD
and the answers are going to be subset of this so u will get full in all
multiple correct questions
hahaha
agree with gordo :) never enter the JEE exam hall expecting a particular pattern of question paper , go and write with a open mind ...
I MEAN...WHT DO U MEAN BY PARTIAL MARKS????HAS IIT GONE CRAZY!!! I MEAN HOW CAN U PRINT MATHEMATIC N PHYSICS WRONG ON THE ORS SHEET>!!!! SAVING PAPER BY MESSING THE FIRST PAGE WITH ALL INSTRUCTIONGS>...ITS SICK!!
paper 1-145
paper 2 I expect around 135
so will I get a decent rank??
@akshay, ur gonna be dissapointed.., u won't get 1234, u'll get a lesser number rank than that for sure ;).
@rohit, :D
I hope so but I really don't expect this I think cutoff will rise by say 15-20 marks
What i think of partial marking:
If the correct answers are BCD,
And if u mark all the four then-0marks
The partial marks is given out of the total correct answers....
If suppose answer is A and C
and u hav marked A alone or C alone...u will b getin some marks....
And NOT if u have marked A and D
or Anythin else.
I saw paper 1, and going by it, I guess cut off should remain the same(approximately) as last year....
I don't think there is any partial marking.... if you haven't got the whole answer correct, you just haven't got it.
where are eureka , asish,debo,aieee,govind????i am expecting their views ...[72] [72] [72] [72]
@ Gordo, I'd have liked to see how much u'd have called this paper good, had u appeared in it.
lol. okay, im terribly sorry if i hurt anyone by calling it a good paper. But i stand by my statement that it's at least a better paper than 2k9's. @soumik, how was ur paper?
rep to #23
paper 1:
m-23 (sigh.....!!!!!!!!!!!!! :( )
p-44 (ok ok)
c-42 (kuch zyada hi aa gaye!! :P)
shit man paper 2 was bad made bad mistakes in Surface tesnion comprehension
getting 260 finally,hoping for something decent atleast