Re-exam.............

@rororo
From my previous post
rahulgandhi@hotmail.com

but I would insist you read my latest posts!

a re exam is impossible it seems.we can reply on this thread till jee 2011 but the only re exam they will give will be jee 2011 itself.
its very unfortunate for those who sufferred due to the ors error,but i dont think we can blame the q paper.maths was tough,but i think our intimidation at that caused us to miss quite a few solvable questions in the tensionatleast with me and even make some silly mistakes.

@ arka
what can be conceived can be achieved. Though the authorities deny its possibility completely. If the judiciary feels that the errors cannot be provided for, re-exam will not be a far away possibility.

@Sneha_D_Queen_
Visit
http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/
and click on e-filing. You just need to register, no advocates and no huge sum of money involved. Rs. 1.50 per page of the petition.

Alternatively, your letter to supremecourt@nic.in can be considered as a petition as well. But I would say that the first option is more viable.

the biggest question is that iit should be fair

i think everyone should be given an equal chance
even if we don't get into iit it should be because of our own mistakes
not those done by iitjab

so re exam is must

I don't think so, abhi - they haven' yet published anything in their sites.

No one can ever understand the stress of a person who had aimed JEE since his childhood. And now when the saga is about to complete, there's the anti-climax of a re-exam.That hard work is being stalked upon a sword tip !

No one can ever bring that 11 April back to those sudents scoring 220+ despite of the nonsense .That perfection , that commitment , that methodology ,that continuum, that balance can never be brought again .Those who wan't to give themselves one more chance ,Let me tell you , it will end worse than what had you thought.

And yeah being baby is an easier task .

ya dats true...v hv all prepaped hard for 2 yrs (n some 3 yrs)....only for April 11th, v gv our best at dt paper...v mayb shouting for re-exam but think...if its re-exam, it will b gvn 2-5 weeeks time..2 year hard work....n now 2-5 weeks hard work...everyone knws which will pay more

take the best out of 2 scores??
take would be the worst thing they can do

GUYS ONE EXPLANATION THAT I HAVE!!!

WHO SAID THE PHYSICS CHEM N MATHS ON THE TOP WERE HEADINGS TO MARK THE ANSWERS>...IT WAS JUST STATED wht the subjects were...!!! they never wrote in instructons to fill according to the subject..!!1

the numbering was NOT like 1-28 for physci....then 1-28 for chem!!!dat it should really confuse........ it was 1-84!!!

so u r tellin me...d so called smart ppl who filled according to the subject heading r so careless...not to see the 28 times serially ordered quetion numbers....???????

I Say the heading in the ORS sheet was just the subjects in the question paper....as nowhere it was mentiaoned that there will be subject heading according to which we fill.........in all exams we do it according to serial order...!!!

hope u get my point!!!

[read it as a third party...not as a student who wants a reexam so dat he gets another try {no offence}]

@rohit
OMR sheet is not the only thing For ur benifit I summarise hereunder:

IIT should take a retest of IIT JEE 2010 due to following:

1.WRONG SUBJECT HEADINGS IN IIT PAPER

The subject headings on OMR sheet did not match with question nos. given below. The IIT authorities quite some time after the exam had started advised to ignore the subject headings and answer according to the serial numbers in the question paper

Students who had started to mark based on subject headings then had to rub off the markings (this has to be done very neatly as any residual markings can be picked while checking). This lead to waste of time, a precious commodity in an exam as competitive as IIT. Besides, students came under undue stress affecting their composure.

2.PARTIAL MARKING

For some questions (of total 45 marks) instructions mentioned that partial marks shall be given for partially correct answer, with no negative marking.

An extreme view put forward is that as there is no negative mark for any wrong answers, if all options are marked full marks should be given. Thus a student can get 45 marks without solving the questions.

IITs clarification is that to avail partial mark the number of choices shaded should not exceed the number of correct choices and must include at least one of the correct choices.

This is an assumption given after the exam is over. In no way could the instruction be interpreted like this by the students. I do not see how IIT marking scheme can take care of how students interpreted the unclear instructions and what effect it had.

3.MISTAKES IN HINDI PAPER

I have not seen the paper but as per reports in English version 6 questions were for 8 marks each ,whereas the Hindi version said 3 marks each. A JEE examinee who has to do a trade-off between time and gains (in terms of scored marks) may have made the wrong choice. In addition, certain questions were not printed.

IITs response is that all these are minor mistakes and will be taken care of during evaluation of papers. IIT IS NOT SAYING WHAT
EXACTLY IT INTENDS TO DO. I am sure they also do not know.
Clearly no amount of moderation can take care of all these BLUNDERS (not minor mistakes) as these have affects that may vary from student to student and can not be quantified.

IIT would need divine intervention to know how to take care of marks a student lost due to lost time/composure/making the wrong choices due to unclear/wrong instructions.

RETEST IS THE ONLY FAIR WAY OUT.

vietnemm...i gave an explanation for ur first doubt only brother!! how stupid of sum1..to IGNORE THE SERIAL NUMBER AND MARK ACC TO THE SUBJECT HEADING!! IT WASNT 1-28,1-28..it was 1-84...a person with normal IQ would knw this!!!

i agree with the 2nd and 3 rd points..but 1st point is bogus !!