ANKIT KA PANDORA BOX 2

19 Answers

1
greatvishal swami ·

ani markonikov rule is nothing

mk rule moh maya hai use bhool jao

consider stability clearly the ethly side wala carbocation is more stable due to inductive effect

aur yahan SN1 ho raha hai naki SN2 so y consider stearic hinderence

1
greatvishal swami ·

aasan hi hai yaar [4][4]

1
ANKIT MAHATO ·

yaaro .. humko laga yeh question itna asaan hai ... but now i think isse difficult question aaya toh fatna tay hai ... [75]

1
greatvishal swami ·

yeah i know its a bit confusing but inductive is not as weak as we sometimes think

106
Asish Mahapatra ·

??[7][7]

1
greatvishal swami ·

k 2-3 hyperconjugation is not much of a diff

but in inductive even an extra C can make the difference

so overall ethyl wala carbpcation more stable

13
deepanshu001 agarwal ·

yes v alwaz consider hyperconjugation in such cases

sn1???

106
Asish Mahapatra ·

@vishal .. but consider the no. of hyperconjugative hydrogens... it is more if carbocation is formed at methyl side.. and hyperconjugation dominates inductive effect rite?

1
greatvishal swami ·

[4][4]

1
ANKIT MAHATO ·

vishal is correct dude !!

1
palani ............... ·

hopefully wrong

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

why??? there is one H atom on both sides....so no need to consider markovnikov/markonikoff/markoniko rule

So the smaller steric hinderance will make Br go to the carbon to which Me is attached, right?? So why is palani wrong??

1
greatvishal swami ·

13
deepanshu001 agarwal ·

no ankit ur ans is wrong from wicheve sorce u r doing
\

1
Kalyan Pilla ·

Is this just about Markonikovs Rule???[12]

1
palani ............... ·

[335]

1
ANKIT MAHATO ·

Br will attach to the other carbon having ethyl grp . not the one having methyl grp(ur ans) ... electromeric effect ....

1
palani ............... ·

didnt get

1
ANKIT MAHATO ·

what u hoped is what u got ! .. sorry wrong ... now the only alternative left is correct ..

Your Answer

Close [X]