1L VALUES FOR SUBSHELL IF THEY EXIST S 0 P 1 D 2 F 3
S-I there are no 2d and 3f orbitals
S-II the l values of 2d and 3f are 2 and 3
-
UP 0 DOWN 0 0 31
31 Answers
1see manipal and rahul,
plz read what bhaiya has written in the reply before this or read any chemistry book on physical chemistry.
and don't try to guess what i am thinking.
1no rahul second statement is not correct as subshells dont define the l values it is l who determines the subshell as if we are getting l values for any subshell it must exist
so statement 2 is wrong
1u can explain by that l=n-1 for 2nd orbital only two values r available 0,1 so 2d does not exist same for 3f and note if magnetic quantum no. is given then also correct explantion think of m=2l-1
11it is but obvious
i don't u wat u r thinking cena (WRESTLEMANIA)[7][7][7]
now the filling f orbitals follow the order
1s
2s
2p
3s
3p
4s
3d
4p
5s
4d
5p
6s
4f
5d
6p
now u can see that d starts 4m this data
that
when n=2 ,n-1 =1
l=0,1
=>0(s),1(p)
and when
n=3
l=0,2
=>0(s),1(p),2(d)
1satement 2 is correct??????????????????????????how?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
AIR-1 please explain.
1the answer is A, bothe statements are correct, and statement II is correct explanation of statementI
1huh!!
i had doubts in d sec statement only..
now its clear fr me ....
d ans must be as u said ....
1oh........... maaf kardho bhai......... maenae usko nahi dhaeka..
[2][2][2][2][2][2]
1Ramkumar as AIR-1 has left u only tell me the correct answer if u know.
1bhai jab tujhe sirf ye word chahiye thee toh reply #9 mein bhi maine yehi likha hai.
1i wanted only the words u made bold .......... "if they exist"
dat was ma doubt n not d value of l.............
he he......
1BHAI EK KAM KAR XI CLASS KI KOI BOOK LE KAR QUANTUM NO. REVISE KAR LE.
11.....1.......1.......1..........ONE, ONE, ONE, ONE.........................
L IS ONE FOR 3P
1AIR-1,TERA QUES. HAI BHAI HAMARE ANS. TO CHECK KAR....KUCH TO BOL...........
1LOOK IN SIMPLE WORDS ANS. IS
STATEMENT 1 CORRECT AND STATEMENT 2 WRONG.
1so easy yaar,
jab 2d or 3f don't exist to kaahe ka l..................
1@john cena .. do u say it(l) may differ for sec statement?????????
if so pls explain me... pls...
[17]
[17]
[17]
1its true dat 2d and 3f orbitals are not there.......
also l=2 fr 2d and l=3 for 3f.........
1statement 1 is absolutely correct
statement 2 is not strictly correct