1
Avinav Prakash
·2010-03-18 08:34:05
probably dis cud b a case
BOTH BORN ON A LEAP YEAR
amy born on...28 FEB, @11:59 PM..
MATTHEW: 29 FEB @12.00 AM...
BUT NOW THEY MIGHT BE CELEBRATIN ON A NON-LEAP YEAR..
POOR MATTHEW (LIKE MYSELF EVRY YEAR) HAD TO CELEBRATE ON 1ST MARCH IE. 2 DAYS LATER...
1
Smriti Kumari
·2010-03-18 09:46:29
actually they shud hv been born in a non leap year & the year of celebration is a leap year
30
Ashish Kothari
·2010-03-18 09:52:23
Smriti didi is correct!
@Avinav bhaiya - I guess you're not wrong practically, but didi's answer is more appropriate! :)
49
Subhomoy Bakshi
·2010-03-19 02:47:43
:D:D...hmmm!! great thoughts!! look avinav BHAIYA it is an advantge on ur part that u wer born on 29th feb!! these problems click ur mind instantly due to that!! so do not consider urself unlucky and do not be sad!![3][3][3][3]
30
Ashish Kothari
·2010-03-19 04:06:10
So true Subhomoy BHAIYA!
By the way, the concept of hiding is very strange.. Because it is very much visible.. If you know, what I'm saying!
1
Shankar C
·2010-03-19 22:34:31
i have already seen this problem somewhere....
they were born while their mother was travelling in a plane
Amy was born in 28 Feb, say in america
her mother crossed the GMT
after that Mathew was born when his mom was in india where it is 1 march.
On a leap yr they have 1 day between their respective b'days
Thats it !!!
:)