Take x=1, y=2, z=3 then does it hold?
Let x,y,z be positive real numbers, satisfying the following inequality :
(x+y+z)(\frac{1}{x}+ \frac{1}{y}+ \frac{1}{z}) < 10
Prove that x,y,z form sides of a triangle.
If you know this , please don't post within a day. :)
-
UP 0 DOWN 0 0 8
8 Answers
to show that x, y,z are sides of triangle it is enough to prove
x<y+z
so
(x+ y+ z ) * (1/x + 1/y + 1/z)
= 1 + 1+ 1+ x/y + x/y + y/x + y/z + z/x + z/y
= 10 > 3 + 2 + x( 1/y + 1/z) + 1/x * (y + z)
implies that
5> 2x/√yz + 2 √yz / x
let a = x/√yz
so
5 > 2a + 2a
solving this we get
1/2 < a < 2
so x/√zy < 2
x< 2√yz < y + z
We have
\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z} \ge \frac{4}{y+z}
Hence
(x+y+z)\left(\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z} \right) \ge (x+y+z)\left(\frac{1}{x}+\frac{4}{y+z} \right)
= 5+ \frac{3x}{y+z} + \frac{x}{y+z} + \frac{y+z}{x} \ge 7+\frac{3x}{y+z}
Now if x \ge y+z we get that the given expression is at least 10 which violates the condition.
Hence x<y+z and by symmetry, y<x+z, and z<x+y and we are done
No I did not know the solution
Its actually IMO 2004
Here is my solution (morally all are the same ...)
Because the inequality is homogeneous, WLOG assume min{x,y,z} = z = 1
WLOG let x ≥y
so on the contrary it suffices to prove if x ≥ y+1 we have
\left ( x+y+1 \right )\left ( \frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{y} + 1\right ) \ge 10
We have x \ge 1+ y \ge 2\sqrt{y} \implies x^2 \ge 4y (*)
After a short calculation we have to prove \frac xy + x + \frac yx + \frac 1x + y + \frac 1y \ge 7
Since y + \frac 1y \ge 2 it is enough to prove
\frac xy + x + \frac yx + \frac 1x \ge 5
Since x \ge y+1 \iff \frac xy \ge 1 + \frac 1y
It will be enough to prove \frac 1y + x + \frac yx + \frac 1x \ge 4
Which is true by AM-GM because \frac x4 + \frac x4 + \frac x4 + \frac x4 + \frac {1}{2y} + \frac {1}{2y} + \frac 1y + \frac yx \ge 8 \left ( \frac{x^2}{4^5 \cdot y} \right )^{1/8}
and by (*) 8 \left ( \frac{x^2}{4^5 \cdot y} \right )^{1/8} \ge 8 \cdot \frac 12 = 4
Actually it is the base case of IMO 2004, the original problem is easy induction after that
or even w/o induction it reduces to proving the same
Prophet sir gave a nice proof, which is not too much involved :)
No facebook likes so far :(
@ shubhodip :
how r u preparing for inmo ????
do you go to any classes???
i have not been able to prepare anything bcoz i have to prepare for boards.....so there r very less chances that i will be selected for inmo....
but all the best to u....
thank you very much
I went to INMO camp only if thats what youre saying ...
all the best to you too :) :)