may be easy may be difficult :)

let a1,a2,a3.......an be n nos such that each a2 is either 1 or -1....If a1a2a3a4 + a2a3a4a5+................ana1a2a3=0.............then prove 4 divides n[1]

14 Answers

62
Lokesh Verma ·

is this a doubt?

This one is from Arthur if i remember correctly!

1
Che ·

no this isnt my doubt[1]

1
Che ·

i found it in ISI mock papers

1
Che ·

array no tries[2]

62
Lokesh Verma ·

hmm.. ISI mocks have become far far tougher than they used to be at my time..

i remember i had almost solved the whole paper in their entrance exam...

but with these questions i wonder how many jee aspirants are able to solve even half of it!

1
Che ·

mm..okh then leave it.....i guess it may be a mere time wastage on our part to be solving such kinda q's....as they wont help in jee

btw i dont know of the level of isi nowadays.....is it this tough

1
xYz ·

riemann can u plz send links for isi mock tests

1
Che ·

@xyz array i dont hav the link....its from a magzine

62
Lokesh Verma ·

hmm... Riemann it is difficult but not impossible..

It uses a very nice logic ..

lets see the number of terms where each ai appears... (4)

they are 4 ..

now the possibilities are that there could be

all these 4 terms as 1
or
3 as 1 and 1 as -1,
or
2 as 1 and 2 as -1
or
1 as 1 and 3 as -1
or
no 1 while all 4 -1

now in each of these cases, observe that if you replace ai by -ai, the sum will change in the cases above by

8, 4, 0, 4 and 8 respectively

so the sum remains unchanged modulo 4 (remainder on division by 4)

After this observation, what we can do is replace all the -1's to 1s

which means that the remainder on division by 4 remains same..

but that would also mean that the sum we have becomes 1+1+1... n times = n

hence n is divisible by 4

[1]

1
Che ·

gr8[1]

62
Lokesh Verma ·

This one is probably the same thing from Arthur angel and not my solution.. i had read it a few months back..

1
Che ·

btw wats arthur angle...is it a book for olymps or wat

62
Lokesh Verma ·

yup.. i guess it is the best book i have ever seen in maths...

1
Che ·

hmm... okie

Your Answer

Close [X]