The Dark Knight has a problem with the factorials

Q. For some Natural No. N the no. of positive integral 'x' satisfying the equation
1! + 2! + 3! + ....... + (x!) = (N)2 is:

A) None B) one C) two D) infinite

I've found the values of x as 3 and 1. So total of 2 values is possible and the answer is also two.......BUT why only 2 solutions ????? Why is it not satisfied by any other no. ??? Please give the proof ...

14 Answers

1
Bicchuram Aveek ·

I need help here !!!! Sending S.O.S for those who can receive the signals .... :-(

341
Hari Shankar ·

what is the last digit for x>3?

62
Lokesh Verma ·

or for x>4 ;)

341
Hari Shankar ·

why wink ?:D.

I 1st thot there was some mistake :)

62
Lokesh Verma ·

lol.. no there was none.. i just winked because i first thought that you gave a wrong hint :D

49
Subhomoy Bakshi ·

the ans is clearly 2......1 and 3....
also for x≥4 1!+2!+3!.....+X!≠PERFECT SQR...

it can be proved...

1!+2!+3!+4!=1+2+6+24=33

from 5! onwards, every no ends with 0......
thus, \Sigma x! ends with 3 and cannot be a perfect square.........

am i correct???i am sure i am.....

62
Lokesh Verma ·

yes subhomoy you are right :)

but you have to complete the proof by explaining the small ting that why no perfect square ends in 3?

49
Subhomoy Bakshi ·

yeeeeeeeeee...............got it......

if i do like this is it ok?????

1*1=1
2*2=4
3*3=9
4*4=16
5*5=25
6*6=36
7*7=49
8*8=64
9*9=81
0*0=0

thus any number ending with 0 to 9 cannot hav sqare value ending with 3
and as every no mst end with 0 to 9 so no sqr ends with 3...
is this explanation ok???????

62
Lokesh Verma ·

Yes this is ok :)

49
Subhomoy Bakshi ·

yyyyeeeeeeessssssssssssss.................

49
Subhomoy Bakshi ·

but is there any other way of proving the above thing???????????

62
Lokesh Verma ·

I cant think of any!

is there one?

49
Subhomoy Bakshi ·

is there one?

341
Hari Shankar ·

I guess you are looking to prove that no square can have last digit 3.

i.e. there is no square of the form 10k+3. One way is of course to start with saying that every integer is of the form 10k±1, ±2,±3,±4 and look at the squares. But that is almost the same as what has been done in Post #9.

The shorter way is to use the Euler Totient Theorem:(read it up. Its a generalization of Fermat's Little Theorem).

We have \phi(10) = 4

Now we want to prove that we cannot have x^2 \equiv 3 \pmod {10}

Now , if x is even then x2-3 is an odd number and its not divisible by 10.

If x is a multiple of 5, evidently x2-3 is not divisible by 10.

So let us assume that x is prime to 10 and \phi(10) = 4

Then we have from Euler Totient Theoremx^4 \equiv 1 \pmod {10}

This implies 3^2 \equiv 1 \pmod {10} which contradicts 3^2 \equiv -1 \pmod {10}

So no perfect square has last digit 3

Your Answer

Close [X]