3
msp
·2009-02-14 11:10:15
check if the qn is like this
24
eureka123
·2009-02-14 20:15:54
u did it 3 minutes before
ur post: #23 Posted 00:47am 15-02-09
my post: #25 Posted 00:50am 15-02-09 [12]......is 50-47=15???[11]
1
MATRIX
·2009-02-14 11:23:15
hey eureka i have done 15 minutes before.............[9][9][9]
24
eureka123
·2009-02-14 11:20:59
i hope u had done that 10 minutes before................[16]
1
MATRIX
·2009-02-14 11:19:08
yaa i knw tapan i was juzz [9][9][1][1]dont be [16][16][16] with me
1
Anurag Khandelwal
·2009-02-14 11:17:04
Here's another method:
Let logx=t; =>x=et =>dx=etdt
=>I=∫et(1/t-1/t2)dt=et/t
=elogx/logx (For Prajith ;)
=x/logx
21
tapanmast Vora
·2009-02-14 11:15:03
dear prajith......
e^logx = x
ther4 ans = x/logx
c thats y i was tellin give da ans...
my ans and ur ans r da same
1
MATRIX
·2009-02-14 11:13:17
hey ma question is that one only............
1
MATRIX
·2009-02-14 11:12:40
Well Tapan the answer is ........
elogx/logx + C
Where C =Constant
3
msp
·2009-02-14 11:11:34
pls post the correct hand written qn praji
24
eureka123
·2009-02-14 11:11:33
plzzzzz tell the question first.................clearly....................
21
tapanmast Vora
·2009-02-14 11:10:11
1st step is integrat by parts
how did u get WAT???
knowing the answer wudnt de motivate nebody frm tryin....
pl ans de do yaar
1
MATRIX
·2009-02-14 11:08:23
sankara can u juzz check the question........
1
MATRIX
·2009-02-14 11:07:38
hw did u get that tapan.....[11][12][12][12][12][12]
1
MATRIX
·2009-02-14 11:04:32
i'll tell the answer..........yaaa.......sure but let others too try it!!!!!!!plzzz b patient tapan.......[1][1][1][1]
21
tapanmast Vora
·2009-02-14 10:59:59
wats the ans then???????????
1
MATRIX
·2009-02-14 10:54:38
The question is fine subash...........
11
Subash
·2009-02-14 10:53:50
prajith i cant understand the question why are there 2/ signs
correct the question if wrong
1
MATRIX
·2009-02-14 10:52:27
sorry tapan.........[2][2] ur wrong...........
21
tapanmast Vora
·2009-02-14 10:49:18
hey i think i got it......
in 1/log(x)
take 1 as integrable functn.... and 1/lnx as the differentiabl.....
u'll get da 2nd part as ∫1/(lnx)2 so it gets cancelled out by - ∫1/(lnx)2
1
MATRIX
·2009-02-14 10:47:35
not at all ..........no limits.......do it!!!!!!!!![5][7][7][7][11][11][12][12]