33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-12-27 23:50:48
But function is zero where x=ln(-x) ... i.e for some negative x ≈-.567
24
eureka123
·2009-11-11 03:26:43
Doing it without transformatons...first time...
lyl=lx+exl
y=x+ex
Dom=R
Range=R
y'=1+ex
But ex>0 always
So y'>0
=>y is increasing function for all xεR
y"=ex>0 always
So concave graph
X intercept => y=0 => ex=-x
We cant predict the accurate value so,we can predict its range of values
For x>0 ex≠-x becoz ex,x>0
So it will lie in (-∞,0)
for xε(-∞,-1) Range of values of y=x >1
So intersection must take place b/w xε(-1,0)
Y intercept => x=0 =>y=1
So graph y=x+ex will be..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b6dd/2b6dd8a4271d890bbe98f2922d36fbba4bcd7b5c" alt=""
Now y=lx+exl
We know expression x+ex vanishes somewhere b/w xε(-1,0)
So for xε(-∞-1) y=-(x+ex)
xε(-1,+∞) y=x+ex
Analysing for this case, y=-(x+ex)
y'<0
y"<0
so convex decreasing
So graph of y=lx+exl will be
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04ee3/04ee3ad28a7664abf56b4a9afb683e0e74f817b3" alt=""
Now continuing for lyl=lx+exl
For y<0 -(y)=lx+exl
y>0 y=lx+exl
From this four cases arise,
y<0 xε(-∞-1) y=x+ex
y<0 xε(-1,+∞) y=-(x+ex)
y>0 xε(-∞-1) y=-(x+ex)
y>0 xε(-1,+∞) y=x+ex
So the final graph will be..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/461f7/461f7992a9aabbad49de0767f84f01fe90dbf95f" alt=""
21
eragon24 _Retired
·2009-11-11 00:57:05
ashish there is a prob with the concavity of ur graph in 2 and 3rd quadrant i think
106
Asish Mahapatra
·2009-11-11 00:52:22
there are more issues... when x--> -∞ y-->∞ which you havent shown
106
Asish Mahapatra
·2009-11-11 00:46:52
deepak: the points u have mentioned is wrong it shud be (0,±1) instead
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-12-27 23:52:04
write the sign scheme of (ex+x)
and that will help
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-12-27 23:42:51
I only use it plot good quality graphs with good details..
never use in getting answer..
I had this software frm the begining but no one has ever seen this. in the forum as i never used it...
Its Microsoft Maths
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-12-27 23:41:19
But function is zero somewhere
where x=ln(-x)
11
Anirudh Narayanan
·2008-12-27 23:39:39
How did you plot the graph, abhi?
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-12-27 23:35:24
Non calculus method...
First y=|x+ex|
for x≥0
it is the sum of graph of y=x
and y=ex
here ex will dominate the nature of curve.... :)
so for y=|x+ex| for x≥0
it is almost similar to ex
with a slight difference
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a06c/0a06c366020998ffd12e17b6f99f5fe45289b89f" alt=""
blue is ex+x
green is ex
and pink is x
so for |y|=|ex+x| for x≥0 it is clear( mirror image about y=0...)
...contd..
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-12-27 23:28:33
yup that one in negative that almost straight line will have slope nearly 1...
and positive part almost similar to ex
and a rough touch between where f(x)=0 and x=0..
i mean roughly mila do... dodno ko
:)
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-12-27 23:23:56
Wait i am now posting a little nice picture with some more detalis :)
1
skygirl
·2008-12-27 23:23:47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1d55/b1d554284b91e4f16f46fa4593262f881ccd6fdb" alt=""
i am very doubtful if i am correct ...