a good one

9 Answers

21
tapanmast Vora ·

n=1

39
Dr.House ·

thats it?

21
tapanmast Vora ·

mazak kar raha hai kya.........

nahi nahi this is jus one of them, the easiest un!! [3]

9
Celestine preetham ·

are u kidding b555

u r indirectly wanting us to prove fermat thm which took 350 yrs for mathematicians worldwide to prove and sol is 180 pages long

n=1 is only possibility

n even is ruled out and n odd ie≥3 is against fermat thm

refer fermat thm in wikipedia

9
Celestine preetham ·

oh yes but then this can be done without using fermat thm ill give ans tomorrow

39
Dr.House ·

sorry celestine. but i dont think many know the beauty of the proof.

wiles was utterly filled with bad luck for not to have got a fields medal for proof to this.(he was above 40 when he proved this)

and I WILL BE WAITING FOR ANOTHER SOLUTION.(as i could not find )

9
Celestine preetham ·

b555 do u have a link to find an understandable version of fermats thm

i cudnt find any and if at all there are a lot of conjuctures that i ve never heard abt involved

9
Celestine preetham ·

9
Celestine preetham ·

edit abv :

in the part
λ is odd replace (f(λ+1) by (f(λ) + 1)

Your Answer

Close [X]