3
msp
·2009-01-10 07:09:50
i can give an example for the correctness of the option A and D
consider a block placed in a rough surface .To move the block we have to give a minimum force equal to μN.below this force we cant move the block.
option B is correct
bcos if we give the force>minimum force we know that the block immediately moves in the direction of app force
1
voldy
·2009-01-10 07:13:25
to woh particle nature kaise suggest karega?
3
msp
·2009-01-10 08:07:24
srinath isnt that example is an analogy for the question
1
skygirl
·2009-01-10 08:58:55
diff between particle nature and wave nature...
>> if it wud have been an wave,
1.) electrons wud have been emmitted at every wavelength.
2.) it wud hav depended on the intensity of light.
>> but from the experiments it was found that
1.) e- are emitted only afetr a certain wavelenth .
any longer wavelnth fails to emit an e-.
2.) once this reqd wavelenth is reached, there is instantaneous emmision...
(ek zaruri kaam hia... aati hun abhi :P)
1
skygirl
·2009-01-10 19:51:24
haan yaar... [2] flop ho gaya sara plan [3]
1
skygirl
·2009-01-10 19:54:57
continuation to my prev to prev post....
so since the experimental results were against the hypothesis,,,
so it proves particle nature of radiations. [1]
(P.S.:- read HC Verma - part2 - pg.no.358 ... PE effect and wave theory of light.)
1
voldy
·2009-01-11 02:05:48
well thanks guys. and gals