9
Celestine preetham
·2008-12-14 08:41:21
now the q is much more simpler its upper half of 4th coordinate cos x+y = 0 is tangent upto which it can reach
ive explained that already way beeeeefore in my prev post . i think that was correct for earlier q u gave
62
Lokesh Verma
·2008-12-14 06:25:57
Yes rohan.. but can u think of something much more elegant??
think graphs :)
1
Rohan Ghosh
·2008-12-14 06:31:08
i just saw and posted ... :D
didnt think of anything else ...
:)
ya i think graphs will make it better :))
1
Rohan Ghosh
·2008-12-14 06:55:29
hmm by geometry i think let the length of z.k be x ... in the fourth quadrant
the question demands that if we go on increasing / decreasing the length in the direction of z
the resultant of vectors 2j^ and z.k will have magnitude >√2
let the angle between 2j^ and z be θ
then
|resultant|>√2
4+x2+4xcosθ>2
for all values of x if cos θ would be fixed ..
as x is in third quadrant x=-p
hmm. getting the same solution with almost same method
62
Lokesh Verma
·2008-12-14 06:57:26
this is not pure geometry...
could you think something much more brilliant... That you start to pat your back once you solve it ;)
1
Akand
·2008-12-14 07:07:26
yikes ive taken for 3rd quad........... EDITING.......
wel.........is this right......... let z=x-iy...
so mod(zk+2i)>√2...
that is mod((x-iy)k+2i)>√2
that is mod(xk+i(2-ky))>√2
that is √((xk)2+(2-ky)2)>√2
that is (xk)2+4+(yk)2-4yk>2
that is x2+y2-4y/k+2/k2>0
which is the exterior of a circle.............
..................DONE EDITING............
62
Lokesh Verma
·2008-12-14 07:13:58
akand read my post no 20 for why u are wrong!
1
varun
·2008-12-14 07:14:18
x < y ?? in fourth quadrant ?
1
Rohan Ghosh
·2008-12-14 07:20:56
hmmm got it!!
okay it is relating to the tangent isnt it ??
1
Akand
·2008-12-14 07:21:21
i still dint understand................. x2+y2-4y/k+2/k2>0
is a circle for all real values of k rite?????????
1
Akand
·2008-12-14 07:22:13
except for k=0............
1
Akand
·2008-12-14 07:24:09
wel if v hav any prob lets differentiate it.......
so
2x+2ydy/dx-4/kdydx>0
so.......dy/dx(2y-4/k)>-2x
1
Akand
·2008-12-14 07:27:10
and dy/dx=x/(4/k-y) which is.....
dy/dx=(xk)/(4-yk).....................so wat????
1
Rohan Ghosh
·2008-12-14 06:19:06
hmm
let us fix one point (q,-p) belonging to z
then it follows the condition
|(q-ip)k + 2i|>√2
in other form
(-pk+2)2+(qk)2 >2
we get
p2k2+4-4pk+q2k2>2
(p2+q2)k2-4pk+2>0
as we have fixed (-p and -q) , the above relation must hold for all k
that is the minimum value of this expression must be >0 and further to have a minimum
f''(k)>0 which is true
we get minimum value as
2 - 4p2/(p2+q2)
hence we get
2q2>2p2
or
(q-p)(q+p)>0
but q+p>0 (as both +ve)
hence q>p
or
x>-y
x+y>0
hence,
we get that portion in the fourth quadrant where x+y>0
62
Lokesh Verma
·2008-12-14 10:07:03
How about this....
kz will give a line passing through 0 and z (when k goes through all the reals)
Now this is a line!
we want that |kz+2i|>√2 for all k
so we want that the distance of this line from -2i be more than √2
so distance of a line through origin from the point (0,-2) should be more than √2!
The limiting case is this. The arrow starting from (0,-2) gives the perpendicular line. Its length here is √2 (for the limiting case!) for other casees it will be more
So the final solution will be the points which are above the strraight line and below the x axis.
9
Celestine preetham
·2008-12-14 10:28:46
k nish
final sol for ur original q ?
am i right
9
Celestine preetham
·2008-12-14 10:29:49
and that line ur saying is x+y=0 i think rohan also got that
62
Lokesh Verma
·2008-12-14 10:35:40
yup i did say Rohan is correct :)
I only wanted to show how this complex looking problem can be solved with such simplicity!
9
Celestine preetham
·2008-12-14 10:56:56
and wat abt my sol for the org q
62
Lokesh Verma
·2008-12-14 11:01:21
oh that was a null set ;)
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-12-14 19:50:24
What i did....
Wrote the given as |z+2i/k|>√2/k ............. for k>0 ;)
Now it represent z as area outside circle having center at -2i/k and radius √2/k for different k.....
Also notice that distance of x±y=0 from -2i/k is √2/k.....
Hence the answer..... on the right side of line x+y=0 as it is outside every circle....
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-12-15 07:47:42
@ Akand.......
u got ;
x2+(y-2/k)2>2/k...
Right...
Then think of its center and radius...
1
Akand
·2008-12-15 07:50:43
ya ok.......centre-(0,2/k) and radi is √2/k..............
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-12-15 07:51:24
on this conclusion u could have reached by complex no also see my earlier post(2 post up)...
From this onward reasoning is same what i gave..
here center and radius is not fixed...
so actually its exterior of circles for different k so its union will give the answer...
1
Akand
·2008-12-15 07:54:07
ya all tht is fyn...........but wat bout tht line x+y=0????
33
Abhishek Priyam
·2008-12-15 07:58:45
Seen my fig above... and the two lines below it and let me know if its clear..
actually x+y=0 will cover the circles completely like a envelope from right and region towards its right is the req region
62
Lokesh Verma
·2008-12-14 04:55:14
maddy, celestine... u guys are taking "K" .. there is one k in the question!
62
Lokesh Verma
·2008-12-14 04:12:18
i modified that question.. i messed a small thing.. :(
that made the question too stupid..
there was a mistake in ur solution even then.. (what about k?)
1
varun
·2008-12-14 04:13:13
-2m2 < x2 + y2 - 4ym < (√2+4)m2
Where m = k(k+1) and m≠0
?
1
skygirl
·2008-12-14 04:17:53
oh shit! harbari me garbari :(
i left the coeff of x^2 and y^2 intact..